By Imbad0202
Run a production-grade academic research pipeline: deep research, paper writing, integrity checks, peer review simulation, revision with response-to-reviewers, and finalization. Includes citation verification, literature review generation, bilingual abstract creation, and format conversion between LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, and Markdown.
ARS academic-paper `rebuttal-audit` mode — QA an existing rebuttal draft against reviewer comments
ARS academic-paper-reviewer `full` mode — simulated peer-review panel
ARS academic-paper `revision-coach` mode — Revision Roadmap + Response Letter Skeleton
ARS academic-paper `revision` mode — revised draft + R&R responses
ARS /ars-unmark-read — rescind a prior human-read mark for one or more citation keys
Transforms research findings into polished APA 7.0 academic reports; activated in Phase 4 and Phase 6
Designs the methodological blueprint; selects research paradigm, method, data strategy, and analytical framework
Integrates findings across sources, resolves evidence conflicts, and maps knowledge gaps
Executes bash commands
Hook triggers when Bash tool is used
Modifies files
Hook triggers on file write and edit operations
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
A comprehensive suite of Claude Code skills for academic research, covering the full pipeline from research to publication.
Install in 30 seconds (Claude Code CLI / VS Code / JetBrains, v3.7.0+):
/plugin marketplace add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
/plugin install academic-research-skills
Then try /ars-plan to walk through your paper structure via Socratic dialogue, or jump to Quick install for prerequisites and the traditional symlink flow.
AI is your copilot, not the pilot. This tool won't write your paper for you. It handles the grunt work — hunting down references, formatting citations, verifying data, checking logical consistency — so you can focus on the parts that actually require your brain: defining the question, choosing the method, interpreting what the data means, and writing the sentence after "I argue that."
Unlike a humanizer, this tool doesn't help you hide the fact that you used AI. It helps you write better. Style Calibration learns your voice from past work. Writing Quality Check catches the patterns that make prose feel machine-generated. The goal is quality, not cheating.
Lu et al. (2026, Nature 651:914-919) built The AI Scientist — the first fully autonomous AI research system to publish a paper through blind peer review at a top-tier ML venue (ICLR 2025 workshop, score 6.33/10 vs workshop average 4.87). Their Limitations section enumerates the failure modes that any fully-autonomous AI research pipeline inherits: implementation bugs, hallucinated results, shortcut reliance, bug-as-insight reframing, methodology fabrication, frame-lock, citation hallucinations.
ARS is built on the premise that a human researcher augmented by AI avoids these failure modes better than either alone. Stage 2.5 and Stage 4.5 integrity gates run a 7-mode blocking checklist (see academic-pipeline/references/ai_research_failure_modes.md); the reviewer offers an opt-in calibration mode that measures its own FNR/FPR against a user-supplied gold set.
Zhao et al. (2026-05) audited 111M references across 2.5M papers on arXiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, and PMC. Their conservative estimate is 146,932 hallucinated citations for 2025 alone, with an observed mid-2024 inflection; for the bioRxiv-to-PMC pairing they report 85.3% preprint-to-published persistence. The paper describes "real citations deployed to support claims the cited references do not actually make" as an open challenge. ARS v3.7.1 added trust-chain frontmatter for source provenance; v3.7.3 added locator infrastructure (three-layer citation anchors) for future claim-level audits and surfaces advisory risk signals at cite time (ARS labels the claim-faithfulness gap internally as "L3"; this is ARS terminology, not the paper's). v3.7.x is motivated by Zhao et al.'s corpus-scale findings; corpus-scale evaluation of ARS itself remains future work.
v3.8 closes the second half of the L3 gap. v3.7.3 made every citation carry a locator anchor; v3.8 adds an opt-in audit pass (ARS_CLAIM_AUDIT=1) that fetches the cited source against each anchor and judges whether the claim is actually supported. Five new HIGH-WARN classes (claim-not-supported, negative-constraint-violation, fabricated-reference, anchorless, constraint-violation-uncited) gate-refuse output through the formatter terminal hard gate. Calibration is shipped as a 20-tuple gold set with FNR<0.15 + FPR<0.10 acceptance thresholds; ramp-on plan is deferred to post-calibration evidence per v3.8 spec §5.
v3.3 was inspired by PaperOrchestra (Song, Song, Pfister & Yoon, 2026, Google): Semantic Scholar API verification, anti-leakage protocol, VLM figure verification, and score trajectory tracking.
👉 docs/ARCHITECTURE.md — the full pipeline view: flow diagram, stage-by-stage matrix, data-access flow, skill dependency graph, quality gates, and mode list.
The architecture doc supersedes the sprawling pipeline description that used to live here. Everything about what runs in which stage now lives in one place.
Prerequisites
npx claudepluginhub imbad0202/academic-research-skills --plugin academic-research-skills完整学术流水线 — 从 idea 到论文的全流程编排:状态机追踪、完整性验证、claim 校验
深度研究 — 13 agent 协作:研究问题定义、系统性检索、偏差评估、综合分析、引用编译
论文评审 — 5 人评审团队 + EIC:方法学、领域、统计、批判性、视角多维度审稿
学术论文写作 — 12 agent 协作:结构设计、段落写作、引用合规、双语摘要、格式排版
A gym for your critical thinking. The AI is the coach; you do the work. Four modes across distinct epistemic stances: drill (12 argument structures, single defensible answer), scene (Socratic frames, never ranks interpretations, plus a fallacy-recognition track), expedition (audit verified impossible-tier problem packs), detective (crack a runtime-generated multi-layer case flaw by flaw). Manipulation-recognition domain, fourteen redlines, and a longitudinal passport on your own machine.
Complete creative writing suite with 10 specialized agents covering the full writing process: research gathering, character development, story architecture, world-building, dialogue coaching, editing/review, outlining, content strategy, believability auditing, and prose style/voice analysis. Includes genre-specific guides, templates, and quality checklists.
Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification
Upstash Context7 MCP server for up-to-date documentation lookup. Pull version-specific documentation and code examples directly from source repositories into your LLM context.
Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review
Comprehensive startup business analysis with market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), financial modeling, team planning, and strategic research
v9.44.1 — Patch release for Gemini environment/version detection and qwen auth gating. Run /octo:setup.