Use this agent to review a plan before implementation begins. This agent catches complexity, scope creep, and over-engineering before any code is written.
description: Use this agent when you have just committed code and need a thorough review of your changes. This agent should be called after running `git commit` to review either the specific commit or the entire branch/PR. You decide which suggestions to implement based on their merit and relevance. Examples: <example> Context: User requests a feature for meeting creators to cancel their meetings. user: "I want meeting creators to be able to cancel meetings. Show a confirmation before actually deleting." user: "yes let's add a cancel button" <function call to git commit omitted> assistant: "Let me use the code-reviewer agent to review this commit." <commentary> Since a commit was just made, use the code-reviewer agent to review the changes before moving on. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User wants an unconference-style grid view for the conference schedule. user: "I want a grid showing meeting spots as columns and time slots as rows, so people can see what's happening across all locations" user: "clicking an empty cell should let you create an event there" user: "yes, each conferenceMeetingSpot is a location" <function call to git commit omitted> assistant: "I'll use the code-reviewer agent to review the entire branch against main." <commentary> The user wants a comprehensive review of all changes on the branch, so launch the code-reviewer agent to analyze the full diff. </commentary> </example> <example> Context: User asks to make meetings editable after creation. user: "meeting creators should be able to edit their meetings - title, time, description, all the fields" user: "inline editing in the MeetingCard would be nice, not a separate page" <function call to git commit omitted> assistant: "Let me use the code-reviewer agent to review this." <commentary> Proactively calling the code-reviewer after a significant commit to catch potential issues. </commentary> </example>
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm", "find ideas", "explore approaches", or explicitly wants multiple perspectives on a problem before deciding.
Use this skill when the current branch has merge conflicts that need to be resolved.
Use this skill when you want to install something (npm / uv / brew / `x.sh | bash` / ...), or when the user asks to install
Tips for starting new projects with good technology stacks
Use this skill when the user wants to find and work on a GitHub issue.
Executes bash commands
Hook triggers when Bash tool is used
Modifies files
Hook triggers on file write and edit operations
Uses power tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
A Claude Code plugin marketplace with tools for better coding habits.
The main plugin - enforces good development practices and automates code review.
Uncommitted changes block - Don't let Claude ask the user questions if there are uncommitted changes.
Auto-review commits - Claude's code gets reviewed automatically after each commit.
Review comment prioritization - Framework for deciding which automated review comments to fix vs skip. (skill)
Manual review command - /quick-review to trigger a code review on demand.
Plan review - Review agent for plans, automatically executed after every plan file edit. (agent)
Plan checklist - Remind Claude to mention in the plan: small commits, a comprehensive TODO list, etc. (skill)
Comment quality check - Reminds Claude that redundant comments are bad.
Package management - Blocks editing package.json/pyproject.toml directly. Enforces npm install / uv add.
WebFetch tip - Remind Claude it can download the file instead.
Brainstorm mode - Multiple perspectives on a problem before deciding. (skill)
Stack recommendations - Tips for starting new projects (Vite+React, uv for Python, etc.) (skill)
Install guidance - Ensures proper installation methods (CLI over manual edits, official docs over memorized instructions). (skill)
Security review for Claude Code plugins with auto-detection of new/changed plugins.
Access Google Workspace APIs (Gmail, Drive, Sheets, Docs) via oauth2l + curl. (skill)
brew install jq (macOS) or apt install jq (Linux). If missing, you'll see a warning at session start and hooks will be disabled./plugin marketplace add hibukki/yonatans-cc-marketplace
/plugin install quick-review@yonatans-cc-marketplace
Add to your .claude/settings.json:
{
"enabledPlugins": {
"quick-review@yonatans-cc-marketplace": true
},
"extraKnownMarketplaces": {
"yonatans-cc-marketplace": {
"source": {
"source": "github",
"repo": "hibukki/yonatans-cc-marketplace"
}
}
}
}
git config core.hooksPath .githooks
This enables the pre-commit hook that auto-bumps the plugin version.
As markdown, with optimizations for LLMs
Seems more promising than the playwright MCP and the claude chrome plugin.
npx claudepluginhub hibukki/yonatans-cc-marketplace --plugin quick-reviewSecurity review for Claude Code plugins with auto-detection of new/changed plugins
Access Google Workspace APIs (Gmail, Drive, Sheets, Docs) via oauth2l + curl
Codex-powered code review gate. Creates a review checkpoint that triggers Codex CLI review when Claude exits.
Backpressure code review that validates changes against REVIEW.md before commits and session completion.
Perform a comprehensive code review of recent changes
Expert code review specialist. Proactively reviews code for quality, security, and maintainability. Use immediately after writing or modifying code.
Code review plugin with a standalone reviewer agent and two skill strategies: disposable subagents for one-shot reviews and persistent team members for iterative reviews
Creates git commits using conventional commit format with appropriate emojis, following project standards and creating descriptive messages that explain the purpose of changes.