Stats
Actions
Available In
Tags
Plugin
pell
Pell Software's Claude Code toolkit: PR/local code reviewers (correctness, quality, security), Jira workflow ops, and house-style guidance. One plugin, many skills.
What's Inside
Slash Commands17
Step 1 — Resolve the PR and context source
/address-review
Pull the inline + general comments off one of your Bitbucket PRs and triage each — apply mechanical fixes to your working tree or reply on the thread. Never commits, never pushes, never resolves threads.
Step 1 — Resolve scope and context source
/correctness-review
Review a code change for correctness only (logic errors, broken invariants, missing error handling). Works on a Bitbucket PR or local changes. Returns a markdown report with all findings.
Step 1 — Parse arguments
/finish-work
Close out a branch by opening a Bitbucket PR and (only on explicit consent) transitioning the linked Jira ticket and adding a PR-link comment. Read-only against Jira by default; PR creation always confirmed.
Step 1 — Parse arguments
/from-ticket
Compose ticket-to-implementation in one command. Fetches a Jira ticket, dispatches /pell:start-work to create a branch, then hands off to superpowers:brainstorming → writing-plans for the design and plan. When superpowers isn't installed, runs a lightweight inline substitute that produces a starter spec.
Step 1 — Resolve scope
/local-review
Three-pass review of local uncommitted changes — dispatches correctness, quality, and security reviewers that respect CLAUDE.md and surrounding code conventions; add "with tests" for an optional fourth test-coverage pass. Optionally applies suggested fixes.
Agents6
correctness-reviewer
/correctness-reviewer
Reviews a code change for correctness — logic errors, off-by-one bugs, broken invariants, missing error handling at real boundaries, race conditions, regressions, and mismatches with stated intent (Jira ticket or CLAUDE.md). Returns ALL findings including nits. Use as part of /pell:correctness-review, /pell:three-pass-review, or /pell:local-review.
quality-reviewer
/quality-reviewer
Reviews a code change for code quality — readability, naming, duplication, premature abstraction, dead code, and especially adherence to repo conventions (CLAUDE.md, linter configs, surrounding patterns). Returns ALL findings including nits. Use as part of /pell:quality-review, /pell:three-pass-review, or /pell:local-review.
repo-quality-reviewer
/repo-quality-reviewer
Reviews a repository (not a diff) for code quality, reusability opportunities, dead code, convention drift, and files that have grown too big. Operates on a focused list of files supplied by the dispatching command. Returns ALL findings including nits. Use as part of /pell:repo-review.
repo-security-reviewer
/repo-security-reviewer
Reviews a repository (not a diff) for sensitive data (SSNs, credit cards, API keys, JWTs, private keys, driver's license patterns) and code-level vulnerabilities (XSS, SQLi, path traversal, hardcoded credentials, crypto misuse, PII logging). Operates on a focused list of files supplied by the dispatching command. Returns ALL findings including low-severity observations. Use as part of /pell:repo-security-review.
security-reviewer
/security-reviewer
Reviews a code change for security vulnerabilities — injection, authn/authz gaps, secret leakage, unsafe deserialization, missing input validation at trust boundaries, OWASP top-10. Returns ALL findings including low-severity nits. Use as part of /pell:security-review, /pell:three-pass-review, or /pell:local-review.
Skills2
frontend-router
/frontend-router
Use at the START of any user-facing UI work in a Pell repo — building React components, pages, layouts, design systems, styling, Tailwind/CSS, marketing pages, dashboards, forms, or any task whose deliverable is something a human will look at in a browser.
visual-scratchpad
/visual-scratchpad
Use when about to explain something inherently visual — architecture or data-flow diagrams, state machines, geometry or layout, before/after comparisons, tree or graph structures, timelines, or table-heavy comparisons — and a rendered view in a browser would communicate it better than terminal prose. Also use when soliciting a choice that's clearer as clickable options than as text.
Stats
Version0.11.0
LanguagePython
Stars0
MaintenanceExcellent
Last Commit
Added
Available In
Safety Signals
Caution
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Tags
Categories
