By denisraison
Code review, cleanup, refactoring, PEP document workflow tools, browser testing agent, and gate-keeper evaluation agent
You are a frontend testing specialist with browser access via claude-in-chrome.
You are a principal engineer evaluating whether a wave of work meets its acceptance criteria. You have read too many postmortems caused by "it looked done." You do not speculate. Every claim you make is backed by evidence you gathered yourself.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "clean up tests", "clean up code", "tidy up tests", "remove dead tests", "organize test files", "fix test structure", or mentions test hygiene, test bloat, removing temporary tests, or following test best practices. Unlike the code-review skill (which reviews a diff for quality), this skill performs batch cleanup across entire files or directories. Reports issues first, then applies fixes after confirmation.
This skill should be used when the user says "create a PEP", "update PEP", "PEP status", "document this", or references PEP-*.md files. Manages PEP (Project Enhancement Proposal) documents for tracking decisions and implementation plans.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "refactor this package", "reorganize this code", "split this file", "this code is a mess", "too many files", "simplify this module", "restructure this", or mentions god structs, god components, god classes, package organization, module structure, or code that is hard to navigate. Unlike the code-cleanup skill (which removes dead code and tests), this skill restructures working code for clarity and maintainability.
Reviews code changes for quality issues. Use when user says "review my changes", "review the diff", "review my code", "check for issues", "sanity check", or asks to find holes, gaps, or simplification opportunities.
This skill should be used when creating or editing documents, diagrams, handover docs, PEPs, or any substantial written output. Also activates when the user says "evaluate this", "run in a loop until good", "rate this out of 10", "is this 10/10", "loop until fixed", "keep improving", or asks for iterative quality improvement on any output.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Has parse errors
Some configuration could not be fully parsed
Runs pre-commands
Contains inline bash commands via ! syntax
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Bash prerequisite issue
Uses bash pre-commands but Bash not in allowed tools
Bash prerequisite issue
Uses bash pre-commands but Bash not in allowed tools
npx claudepluginhub denisraison/claude-plugins --plugin workflow-toolsAnalyse Claude Code conversation history for search and summaries
Logo design generation pipeline using Gemini image generation. Generates prompt variations, calls API, evaluates results, and iterates.
Git commit workflow commands: commit, push and PR, branch cleanup
Generate professional architecture and flow diagrams using D2 with C4 model conventions. Includes style guide, judge loop for quality iteration, and layout best practices.
Utilities for creating and validating Claude Code skills
Workflow skills and agents: code-walk-thru, log-work, make-issue-spec skills; ui-tester agent for browser-based UI validation
24 parallel audit agents + 6 workflow skills for Claude Code. Complete E2E development workflow for solo devs.
Task-focused agents for test, review, debug, docs, CI, security, refactoring, research, performance, and search-replace — with teammate and subagent role guidance
Cross-agent review workflow: Claude implements, Codex reviews
An easy way to force agent to think again if it's statement that the "Job is done and production ready" is actually done - usually it's not. Thanks to this command you don't have to check after the agent if they did their job.
Core development agents and code quality hooks