By ComposioHQ
Conduct iterative multi-agent AI audits of your codebase across code quality, security, performance, testing, architecture, database, API, frontend, backend, and DevOps domains until zero issues remain. Tracks technical debt, verifies fixes, and creates GitHub issues for findings.
This file contains detailed agent coordination for `/audit-project`.
This file contains GitHub integration for `/audit-project`.
Multi-agent code review with iterative improvement
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub composiohq/awesome-claude-plugins --plugin audit-projectSuite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component HTML artifacts using React, Tailwind CSS, and shadcn/ui. Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components.
Use this agent when code changes have been made and you need to write new tests, run existing tests, analyze failures, and fix them while maintaining test integrity. This agent should be triggered proactively after code modifications to ensure comprehensive test coverage and suite health. Examples:\n\n<example>\nContext: The user has just implemented a new feature or modified existing code.\nuser: "I've updated the user authentication logic to support OAuth"\nassistant: "I've successfully updated the authentication logic. Now let me run the test-writer-fixer agent to ensure all tests pass with these changes."\n<commentary>\nSince code changes were made, use the Task tool to launch the test-writer-fixer agent to run relevant tests and fix any failures.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: The user has refactored a module or changed function signatures.\nuser: "Please refactor this payment processing module to use async/await"\nassistant: "I've completed the refactoring to use async/await throughout the payment module."\n<function call omitted for brevity>\nassistant: "Now I'll use the test-writer-fixer agent to run the tests and fix any issues caused by the refactoring."\n<commentary>\nAfter refactoring code, proactively use the test-writer-fixer agent to ensure tests still pass.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: The user has fixed a bug or made a critical change.\nuser: "Fix the race condition in the data synchronization service"\nassistant: "I've identified and fixed the race condition by implementing proper locking mechanisms."\n<function call omitted for brevity>\nassistant: "Let me run the test-writer-fixer agent to verify the fix doesn't break existing functionality."\n<commentary>\nAfter bug fixes, use the test-writer-fixer agent to ensure the fix works and doesn't introduce regressions.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: Code lacks test coverage for critical functionality.\nuser: "Our payment processing module has no tests"\nassistant: "That's a critical gap. Let me use the test-writer-fixer agent to create comprehensive tests for the payment module including edge cases and error scenarios."\n<commentary>\nCritical modules without tests are high-risk areas that need immediate test coverage.\n</commentary>\n</example>\n\n<example>\nContext: After implementing a new feature that needs tests.\nuser: "I've added the social sharing functionality"\nassistant: "Great! The social sharing is implemented. Now let me use the test-writer-fixer agent to write tests that ensure this feature works correctly across different platforms."\n<commentary>\nNew features should always include comprehensive test coverage from the start.\n</commentary>\n</example>
Streamlines pull request creation by handling the entire workflow: creating a new branch, committing changes, formatting modified files with Biome, and submitting the PR.
Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use proactively when encountering any issues.
Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and sends a personalized growth report.
24 parallel audit agents + 6 workflow skills for Claude Code. Complete E2E development workflow for solo devs.
AI-powered development workflow automation - Phase-based planning, implementation orchestration, preflight code quality checks with security scanning, ship-it workflow, and development principles generator for CLAUDE.md
Use Claude Code As Is - native plugin leveraging built-in architecture
Comprehensive code review with architecture, security, and PR enhancement
Perform a comprehensive code review of recent changes
Universal quality control orchestrator and final authority for any software development project. Dynamically discovers and coordinates with available sub-agents, performs comprehensive multi-dimensional quality assessment, security validation, and deployment readiness verification. Adapts to any project type, programming language, or development framework while maintaining enterprise-grade quality standards. Examples: <example>Context: Code changes ready for review across any project. user: 'Please review this code before commit' assistant: 'I'll use the 1-ceo-quality-control-agent to orchestrate comprehensive quality validation, discover available specialists, and perform final security scanning before approval.' <commentary>Universal quality control requires comprehensive validation across all dimensions regardless of project type.</commentary></example> <example>Context: Multi-agent work completion needing validation. user: 'Several agents completed their tasks, need quality review' assistant: 'Let me engage the 1-ceo-quality-control-agent to coordinate comprehensive validation across all completed work and ensure quality standards.' <commentary>Multi-agent coordination and quality validation applies to any development project.</commentary></example>