AI-powered focus group reviews with deep review protocols, advanced methodologies (Delphi, Debate, Walkthrough, Comparative), quality control, and rich output formats (action plans, SWOT, risk matrices, HTML reports).
Opus-tier agent for focus group persona generation, synthesis, and panel curation
Persona-driven reviewer agent that examines a target from a specific character perspective and writes a structured review
This protocol defines a multi-target comparative review where each persona reviews all targets on identical criteria. The command reads this document and follows the instructions.
This protocol defines a structured Red Team vs Blue Team debate with a Judge persona. The command reads this document and follows each round's instructions.
This protocol defines a 3-round iterative review process where reviewers refine their positions based on anonymized group feedback. The command reads this document and follows each round's instructions sequentially.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
A growing collection of Claude Code plugins by Beargle Industries. New plugins are actively in development — add the marketplace once and get access to everything as it ships.
| Plugin | Description |
|---|---|
| focusgroup | AI-powered focus group reviews with deep protocols, advanced methodologies, quality control, and rich output formats |
| changelog | Changelog generation with doc-vs-code consistency auditing — catches wrong install instructions, outdated API examples, nonexistent CLI flags, and more |
| obs-vault | Persistent Obsidian-based memory across sessions. Knowledge vault for project context, architecture decisions, component notes, and TODOs |
| More coming soon |
Add this marketplace to Claude Code:
claude plugin marketplace add BeargleIndustries/beargle-plugins
Then install any plugin:
claude plugin install focusgroup
claude plugin install changelog
Restart Claude Code after installing.
If new plugins have been added to the marketplace, update the marketplace cache first:
claude plugin marketplace update beargle-plugins
Then install or update individual plugins:
claude plugin install changelog
claude plugin update focusgroup
npx claudepluginhub beargleindustries/beargle-plugins --plugin focusgroupChangelog generation with doc-vs-code consistency auditing. Generates changelogs from git history and catches documentation that doesn't match reality — wrong install instructions, outdated API examples, nonexistent CLI flags, and more.
Persistent Obsidian-based memory for Claude Code. Gives your AI agent a knowledge vault that persists across sessions — project context, architecture decisions, component notes, patterns, and TODOs, all stored as an Obsidian graph.
An agile retrospective skill for your Claude collaboration sessions. Capture what you learned. Apply the fix. Make the next session better.
Use this agent when you need to analyze user feedback from multiple sources, identify patterns in user complaints or requests, synthesize insights from reviews, or prioritize feature development based on user input. This agent excels at turning raw feedback into actionable product insights. Examples:\n\n<example>\nContext: Weekly review of user feedback
Multi-agent adversarial review panel — 4-6 AI reviewers debate your code/plans, then a judge delivers a structured verdict with epistemic labels. Bundles plan-review-integrator for applying review findings back into implementation plans.
Use this agent when conducting user research, analyzing user behavior, creating journey maps, or validating design decisions through testing. This agent specializes in understanding user needs, pain points, and behaviors to inform product decisions within rapid development cycles. Examples:\n\n<example>\nContext: Understanding user needs for a new feature
Structured thinking and multi-perspective deliberation tools
Meta-cognition: refine input through brainstorming, refine output through challenge and condensed communication mode.