By asbarron
Review and revise implementation plans: tech-stack-aware best practices, DRY checks, structure analysis, and completeness review.
Best practices lens: tech-stack anti-patterns, deprecated approaches, authoritative resource violations.
Completeness lens: missing error handling, testing, rollback, security, observability.
DRY lens: duplicated logic, repeated plan steps, reinventing existing repo code.
Structure lens: phase ordering, dependencies, parallelization, logical grouping.
Plan reviser: produces an improved version of the plan incorporating review findings and user answers.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Claude Code plugins by Ava Barron.
Add this marketplace once, then install any plugin:
# In Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add asbarron/claude-skills
# Install a plugin
/plugin install <plugin-name>@asbarron-skills
CLI equivalent:
claude plugin marketplace add --scope user asbarron/claude-skills
claude plugin install <plugin-name>@asbarron-skills
pr-reviewCalibrated PR reviews via Claude Code. Run /pr-review in any repo with an open PR — Claude reads the diff, calibrates to the repo's current state, and posts inline comments + an overall verdict to GitHub under your own account via gh CLI.
Use --deep for a multi-lens review: four parallel agents (code quality, security, architecture, git history) with research-backed confidence scoring that filters false positives.
Prerequisites: gh CLI installed and authenticated (gh auth login).
/pr-review # current branch's PR
/pr-review 42 # specific PR (bare, #42, or full URL)
/pr-review 42 --dry-run # preview without posting
/pr-review 42 --approve # post as approval (if no blocking issues)
/pr-review 42 --deep # multi-lens review with confidence scoring
/pr-review 42 --deep --dry-run
Normal mode (default):
gh api under your GitHub identityDeep mode (--deep):
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
issue: | Must fix — correctness, security, data loss |
suggestion: | Take it or leave it |
question: | Genuine confusion, not a criticism |
nitpick: | Minor style/naming, your call |
praise: | Something done well |
Append [non-blocking] to an issue: that matters but isn't merge-blocking.
pro-planPlan and TDD review via Claude Code. Run /pro-plan on any implementation plan — Claude detects the tech stack, web-searches for canonical resources (books, official docs), reads CONTRIBUTING.md as a source of truth, and runs four parallel review lenses. Then it asks you targeted questions and produces a revised plan.
Prerequisites: None.
/pro-plan # most recent Claude Code plan
/pro-plan path/to/plan.md # specific plan or TDD
/pro-plan path/to/plan.md --review-only # review + questions, no revision
/pro-plan path/to/plan.md --revise-only # restructure/improve, no review
Revised plans are written to {original-name}-pro.md in the same directory.
Phase 1 — Review:
go.mod, package.json, etc.)Phase 2 — Revise:
<!-- pro-plan --> comments so you can see what changednpx claudepluginhub asbarron/claude-skills --plugin pro-planCalibrated PR reviews via gh CLI. Use --deep for multi-lens review with confidence scoring.
Pre- and post-implementation validation with parallel subagents: /replan validates plans before execution, /recheck verifies implementations match the plan
Codex, Gemini, Claude の3つの AI で Plan ファイルを並列レビュー。実装計画の妥当性、抜け漏れ、リスクを分析する
Point it at a codebase and it figures out what's worth doing — bugs, perf, tech debt, what to build next — then writes plans any agent can execute. It can hand the work to a cheaper model and review the result. It never edits your code.
Independent plan/spec reviewer for AI coding agents. Verifies claims against the workspace and returns structured verdicts with findings.
Autonomous Claude + Codex review loop. Plan a feature with adversarial pushback, or audit code, all in one window.
For easy problems, start here. For harder problems, do this after Explore.