gilfoyle

Full board deliberation with discussion rounds - directors debate and reach consensus

Quick board review - get expert opinions from 5 directors without full deliberation

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores requirements and design before implementation.

Get strategic business advice from an expert CEO advisor with 30 years of entrepreneurship experience

Get marketing strategy and brand positioning advice from an expert CMO advisor with 30 years of marketing leadership experience

Full Board of Directors deliberation with 5 expert directors assessing, discussing, and voting.

Expert CEO advisor with 30 years entrepreneurship experience. Provides strategic guidance, business analysis, and leadership advice. Advisory only - does not modify code.

Expert CMO advisor with 30 years of marketing leadership experience. Provides marketing strategy, brand positioning, and growth guidance. Advisory only - does not modify code.

Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: <example>Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication system as outlined in step 3 of our plan" assistant: "Great work! Now let me use the code-reviewer agent to review the implementation against our plan and coding standards" <commentary>Since a major project step has been completed, use the code-reviewer agent to validate the work against the plan and identify any issues.</commentary></example> <example>Context: User has completed a significant feature implementation. user: "The API endpoints for the task management system are now complete - that covers step 2 from our architecture document" assistant: "Excellent! Let me have the code-reviewer agent examine this implementation to ensure it aligns with our plan and follows best practices" <commentary>A numbered step from the planning document has been completed, so the code-reviewer agent should review the work.</commentary></example>

Master coordinator for the Conductor Evaluate-Loop. Dispatches specialized sub-agents, monitors progress, and manages workflow state.

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Includes tech debt analyzer, team scaling calculator, engineering metrics frameworks, technology evaluation tools, and ADR templates. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, making architecture decisions, establishing engineering metrics, or when user mentions CTO, tech debt, technical debt, team scaling, architecture decisions, technology evaluation, engineering metrics, DORA metrics, or technology strategy.

Technical architecture review agent for execution plans. Uses cto-advisor skill to evaluate technical decisions, architecture patterns, tech debt implications, and technology choices in plan.md. Triggered by: 'review technical plan', 'cto review', 'architecture review', or automatically during Step 2 (Evaluate Plan) for tracks involving architecture decisions, integrations, or infrastructure changes.

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

Specialized business logic evaluator for the Evaluate-Loop. Use this for evaluating tracks that implement core product logic — pipelines, dependency resolution, state machines, pricing/tier enforcement, packaging. Checks feature correctness against product rules, edge cases, state transitions, data flow, and user journey completeness. Dispatched by loop-execution-evaluator when track type is 'business-logic', 'generator', or 'core-feature'. Triggered by: 'evaluate logic', 'test business rules', 'verify business rules', 'check feature'.

Specialized code quality evaluator for the Evaluate-Loop. Use this for evaluating code implementation tracks where the deliverable is functional code — features, API routes, state management, utilities. Checks build integrity, type safety, code patterns, error handling, dead code, imports, test coverage, and naming conventions. Dispatched by loop-execution-evaluator when track type is 'feature', 'refactor', or 'infrastructure'. Triggered by: 'evaluate code', 'code review', 'quality check', 'build check'.

1 hook across 1 event