By aadityaparab
AI governance toolkit — DLP scanning, data guardrails, risk register, compliance evidence, audit trail, and EU AI Act classification embedded in your workflow.
AI risk classification and governance skill. Classifies AI use cases by EU AI Act risk tier (Unacceptable/High/Limited/Minimal), enforces organizational AI acceptable use policies, determines transparency and human oversight requirements, tracks data lineage for AI-assisted outputs, and generates compliance artifacts for model governance. Use when evaluating AI use cases, building AI workflows, or assessing regulatory compliance.
Compliance audit log generator. Creates structured, immutable audit records (JSON-lines format) for guardrail decisions, DLP scans, 4-eyes review workflows, and AI-assisted outputs in regulated categories. Designed for SIEM and GRC platform ingestion with built-in retention governance per GDPR, SOC 2, and HIPAA. Use when you need audit logs, compliance trails, or interaction history.
Token-efficient communication mode. Compresses conversational prose (~65-75% output token savings) while keeping code, commands, and compliance artifacts untouched at full fidelity. Use when the user asks for "caveman mode", "brief mode", "less tokens", or when long sessions risk context pressure. Adapted from github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman with sentinel-stack governance carve-outs.
Compliance artifact generator. Auto-generates audit evidence from guardrail detections, 4-eyes review gates, and DLP scans. Maps control evidence to SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and GDPR Article 30. Generates evidence packages on demand for auditors and tracks control effectiveness over time. Use for audit preparation, compliance evidence collection, or SOC 2/ISO 27001 artifact generation.
Governance decision validation skill. Reviews decisions for logical consistency, evidence quality, bias indicators, and completeness. Checks that decisions reference appropriate policies and have proper authorization. Outputs audit findings with severity ratings. Use for quality assurance of governance decisions or investigating concerns.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Open-source AI governance for every LLM.
10 specialized agents that embed DLP, EU AI Act compliance, and real-time audit evidence into your AI workflows — so compliance happens automatically, not after the fact.
Works with Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Copilot, Cursor, and any model that reads markdown.
"Compliance isn't something you do separately. It's a byproduct of doing your work through guardrails."
Every company using AI is sitting on a ticking compliance clock.
Sentinel Stack takes a fundamentally different approach: governance is embedded in the workflow, not bolted on after.
Every AI interaction passes through a DLP engine and compliance guardrails. Every blocked request automatically becomes audit evidence that your controls work. Every 4-eyes review gate becomes segregation-of-duties proof. Every scan — even the clean ones — becomes evidence that your monitoring is active.
You don't "do GRC" separately. It happens because your AI workflows run through Sentinel Stack.
| Skill | What it does |
|---|---|
| guardrails | Scans every prompt and file for sensitive data before processing. Hard blocks on client data and financial identifiers. Soft blocks with clarification for ambiguous cases. Enforces GDPR/privacy handling. Appends 4-eyes review gates to high-stakes outputs. Emits compliance signals on every decision. |
| dlp-engine | 3-tier sensitivity scoring engine. Tier 1: regex pattern matching (SSNs, API keys, credentials). Tier 2: industry classifiers (private markets, healthcare, fintech, legal). Tier 3: behavioral baselines (anomalous request size, off-hours, new provider). Produces a 0-100 score → allow / log / alert / redact / block. |
| Skill | What it does |
|---|---|
| ai-governance | Classifies AI use cases by EU AI Act risk tier (Unacceptable / High / Limited / Minimal). Enforces your AI acceptable use policy. Determines transparency obligations — when must users know they're interacting with AI? Specifies meaningful human oversight requirements for high-risk systems. Tags AI-generated content with data lineage metadata. |
| vendor-ai-risk | Evaluates third-party AI tools across 5 dimensions: security, privacy, AI-specific risks (bias, hallucination, transparency), contractual requirements (DPA, liability, SLAs), and regulatory compliance. Quick triage mode (5 min) and deep assessment mode (full due diligence). Produces a scored risk card with go/no-go recommendation. |
| Skill | What it does |
|---|---|
| compliance-evidence | Auto-generates framework-mapped evidence from normal guardrail operations. Every DLP block → Data Classification control evidence. Every 4-eyes gate → Segregation of Duties proof. Maps to SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and GDPR Article 30. Generates evidence packages on demand for auditors. |
| risk-register | Living risk register that auto-populates from guardrail detections. Every hard block, soft block, and behavioral anomaly becomes a risk entry. 5×5 likelihood-impact scoring. Categorizes across Data Privacy, AI Ethics, Regulatory, Operational, Reputational, Financial. Tracks treatment (accept/mitigate/transfer/avoid) with owner assignment. Trend analysis and board-ready reports. |
| audit-trail | Structured JSON-lines logs from every guardrail decision, DLP scan, 4-eyes review, and AI-assisted output. Ready for SIEM ingestion (Splunk, ELK, Datadog). Retention guidance by regulation (GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA). Generates audit reports by time period, framework, or event type. |
| policy-drafter | Drafts organizational AI policies: Acceptable Use, Data Handling, Third-Party AI Vendor, and Incident Response. Pre-fills with sensible defaults based on your industry and jurisdiction. Flags sections that must be customized. Includes version control, review cadence, and approval workflow. |
npx claudepluginhub aadityaparab/sentinel-stack --plugin sentinel-stackTriages proposed AI use cases against your registry, runs impact assessments across the regimes in scope, reviews vendor AI terms for training-on-data and liability gaps, and keeps your AI policy current with practice.
18 DPIA and PIA skills: GDPR Art. 35, risk scoring, stakeholder consultation, threshold screening, mitigation planning
ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) advisor — gap analysis, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment (AISIA), Annex A control guidance, SoA generation, policy writing, and certification readiness for ISO/IEC 42001:2023.
Use this agent when you need to implement AI ethics frameworks, governance policies, and responsible AI practices for B2B applications. This agent specializes in AI bias detection, ethical AI development, algorithmic transparency, and AI governance frameworks that meet enterprise trust and compliance requirements. Examples:
AGT governance hooks and MCP tools for Claude Code sessions
GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) domain knowledge — frameworks, controls, audits, evidence, ConMon, cross-framework mappings, document review, and operational workflows. Cloud-agnostic.