{"name":"hirotokanda-hk-plugins","owner":{"name":"ClaudePluginHub"},"plugins":[{"name":"hirotokanda-orchestra-plugins-orchestra-2","source":{"source":"github","repo":"hirotokanda/hk-plugins"},"description":"Multi-agent orchestration for structured TDD development. Bare /orchestra sets up the Claude Code + Codex environment (auto-detects project commands, offers to install recommended plugins with consent, and writes an orchestra-enabled block into the project's CLAUDE.md so complex tasks route through the workflow automatically); /orchestra <request> conducts a Plan -> Implement -> Review -> Commit cycle, delegating planning/review to Claude subagents and implementation to ChatGPT Codex via the `codex` CLI. Requires the `codex` CLI and the `claude-code-setup` plugin.","version":"1.2.0","strict":true,"keywords":["orchestration","tdd","codex","multi-agent","workflow","code-review"],"category":"productivity"},{"name":"hirotokanda-reading-papers-plugins-reading-papers","source":{"source":"github","repo":"hirotokanda/hk-plugins"},"description":"Read, summarize, evaluate, or critique a research paper (PDF / DOI / arXiv / URL) with one unified four-stage method — Triage -> Comprehend -> Critique -> Integrate — fusing Keshav's three-pass method and Elliott/Beck/DeMarco's Four i's. Triage answers the five C's and decides depth; Comprehend uses active reading + figure scrutiny; Critique reconstructs/re-derives the work and challenges every assumption; Integrate connects it to what you know and how you'll track it. Default output is a structured summary + critique + integration. For physics/experimental papers it also loads a physics.md toolbox (units-limits-symmetries, statistical vs systematic uncertainty, 3-sigma/5-sigma significance and look-elsewhere, reduced-chi-squared/residuals and log plots, PRL-Letter/companion and arXiv/Supplemental norms, a six-question evaluation gauntlet). Also runs literature surveys.","version":"1.0.0","strict":true,"keywords":["paper-reading","literature-review","research","physics","arxiv","peer-review"],"category":"deployment"},{"name":"hirotokanda-thesis-reviewer-plugins-thesis-reviewer","source":{"source":"github","repo":"hirotokanda/hk-plugins"},"description":"Structural reviewer for science/engineering theses (理工系卒業論文). /thesis-structure-review <path> reads a thesis (PDF, LaTeX, or Markdown) and grades how well its structure fits a standard 6-chapter template, with special focus on the logical parallelism that should run through Theory/Method/Result/Discussion (baseline→proposed, simple→general). Cites concrete chapter/section numbers and quotes, checks figure/table placement, and reports in the thesis's own language. Evaluates structure and logic only — never physical or mathematical correctness.","version":"0.1.0","strict":true,"keywords":["thesis","卒業論文","structure-review","academic-writing","logical-flow","peer-review"],"category":"deployment"}]}