{"name":"radesjardins-rad-planner-plugins-rad-planner","owner":{"name":"ClaudePluginHub"},"plugins":[{"name":"radesjardins-rad-planner-plugins-rad-planner","source":{"source":"github","repo":"radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills"},"description":"Plan a project before you write code — and re-plan it as reality unfolds. Built for solo developers who aren't formally trained engineers: it interrogates you until it actually understands what you're building, then produces a plan a moderately experienced vibe coder can read AND a coding agent can execute. Strictly a planner — it never writes implementation code.\n\nThe method is interview-driven, risk-first, adversarially-reviewed, and mechanically-validated:\n- The grilling: a structured discovery interview — eight coverage areas (end goal, users, MVP, success criteria, constraints, assets, exclusions, danger zones), each driven to settled-or-explicitly-unknown; the project mirrored back for correction; assumptions proposed for confirm/deny. Capped at 3 rounds so it stays fast.\n- The release ladder: every plan anchors to your end goal via a Now / Next / Later release map — Now (MVP/Beta, fully specced tasks), Next (V1 milestone outline), Later (end-goal themes). Detail decays with distance by design; pulling the next horizon into detail is a /replan event.\n- Written for two readers: a plain-language layer (how-to-read note, release map, 'After this ships' lines) for you; six-field task blocks (objective, files, dependencies, done-when, validation, rollback) for the coding agent.\n- Codegen-aware stack evaluation (AI-native Golden Path matrix), goal-backward decomposition, risk-first sequencing with size discipline.\n- Mechanical validation via `plan-lint.py` (required sections incl. the release map, per-task fields, dependency resolution + cycles, vague language) — a real pass/fail check, not the model grading itself.\n- Adversarial review via the `risk-assessor` agent against 14 documented anti-patterns (APPROVE / REVISE / RETHINK; iterative on the full path, single-pass on the quick path you can choose at discovery).\n\nFour skills — two doors in, one maintained plan:\n- `/plan` — greenfield or a clear next effort: the six-phase conversation → `docs/plan.md`.\n- `/rescue` — a project in an unclear state: read-only archaeology (code + git evidence), evidence-led interview (keep/cut/unknown per piece), then a fresh release-map plan from where the project actually is. Assesses and plans; never fixes, runs, or deletes code.\n- `/replan` — evidence-based plan update: marks shipped work from git + handoff (moved to a `## Shipped` section — history preserved, never deleted), re-baselines the rest, pulls the next horizon into detail when Now ships.\n- `/review-plan` — two-layer quality audit of an existing plan (mechanical lint + adversarial risk review).\n\nThe PRD exception: when `docs/prd.md` is missing or skeletal, the planner offers to draft it — each section written from your own interview answers, applied only on per-section confirmation. After that birth the PRD is yours (rad-repo-manager keeps it fresh); the planner never edits an existing PRD. Other durable-doc changes go into a paste-ready `docs/[date]-update-prompt.md` for you to apply — durable docs stay under your control.\n\nPairs with rad-repo-manager (which maintains plan.md status and PRD freshness between plans); works standalone. Two agents: `stack-advisor`, `risk-assessor`.","version":"6.0.0","strict":true,"keywords":["planner","planning","plan-first","implementation-plan","risk-first","adversarial-review","plan-lint","stack-evaluation","project-planning","coding-planner"],"category":"development"}]}