{"name":"radesjardins-rad-council-plugins-rad-council","owner":{"name":"ClaudePluginHub"},"plugins":[{"name":"radesjardins-rad-council-plugins-rad-council","source":{"source":"github","repo":"radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills"},"description":"A council of cognitive-framework advisors that debates any decision — repo plans, website designs, product/codebase critiques, marketing plans, anything — then votes and returns one ranked, confidence-rated recommendation with dissent preserved and a single concrete next step.\n\nDiversity comes from incompatible *reasoning lenses* (The Contrarian, First Principles, The Vulcan, The Metric, The Storyteller, The Outsider, The Executor, The Orator, The Expansionist, The Growth Catalyst), not personas — research shows cognitive frameworks beat roleplay, and that perspective diversity (not debate depth) is the dominant driver of quality.\n\nOne skill, `convene`, with two modes: `standard` (independent drafts → one blind peer-review round + dot-vote → rigor-weighted synthesis) and `quick` (parallel critics → synthesis, no review round). A Blue Hat orchestrator auto-selects 3–5 seats for any topic by engineering natural tension between opposing lenses (hard cap 5). Synthesis weights by empirical rigor and logical consistency — never headcount — preserves genuine clashes, rates confidence 1–10, and commits to exactly one next step (disagree-and-commit).\n\nGuardrails are baked in against the documented failure modes of multi-agent debate: conformity drift (independent generation), sycophancy (framework constraints, not personas), false consensus (preserved dissent), and runaway cost (hard agent/round caps + effort scaling). Claude-only — no external API keys. Output is one self-contained markdown report, delivered where you choose, never auto-committed.\n\nPairs with rad-brainstormer (diverge → converge) and rad-planner (decide → sequence); recommends rad-code-review for deep code passes rather than duplicating it.","version":"0.1.0","strict":true,"keywords":["council","debate","multi-agent","decision-making","critique","red-team","cognitive-frameworks","deliberation"],"category":"testing"}]}