Stats
Actions
Tags
From review-pack
Run a structured code review of the current branch or a named PR using the review skill.
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/review-pack:review [PR number or 'branch']The summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
Run the `review` skill against $ARGUMENTS (or the current branch if empty). If the diff is large (>30 changed files), spawn multiple `code-reviewer` subagents in parallel — one per concern (correctness, security, performance, tests) — and combine their findings. Lead the response with the severity-ordered findings list, then a one-line verdict.
Run the review skill against $ARGUMENTS (or the current branch if empty).
If the diff is large (>30 changed files), spawn multiple code-reviewer subagents in parallel — one per concern (correctness, security, performance, tests) — and combine their findings.
Lead the response with the severity-ordered findings list, then a one-line verdict.
npx claudepluginhub s-hiraoku/claude-harnesses --plugin review-pack/reviewReviews staged changes or recent commits across five axes—correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance—producing categorized findings with file:line references and fixes.
/reviewRuns Codex code review on local git state (working tree or vs base branch). Supports --wait/--background, --base <ref>, --scope auto|working-tree|branch.
/reviewInvokes multiple external AI CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, etc.) to independently review a phase plan and produces a structured REVIEWS.md with per-reviewer feedback.
/reviewRuns an enhanced multi-LLM PR review with inline comments, checking availability of local and API-based providers for cross-model escalation.
/reviewReviews HTML file for design anti-patterns, principles violations, and accessibility issues. Generates markdown report with status tables and recommendations.
/reviewReviews specified code scope via four specialists (quality, security, performance, architecture), producing summary, detailed findings, refactoring suggestions, prioritized action plan.