How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/review:review [base-branch] [--staged] [--commit sha] [--files glob] ["focus"]sonnetThis command is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
Starte einen Review mit dem review Skill. Kontext: - Argumente: $ARGUMENTS - Aktueller Branch: !`git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "kein git repo"` - Verfuegbare Branches: !`git branch --list 2>/dev/null | head -20 || echo "keine"` - Working Tree Status: !`git status --short 2>/dev/null | head -30 || echo "kein git repo"` Fuehre den Review gemaess der Skill-Anleitung durch. Lies zuerst den Skill und die Referenzdateien, dann folge den Phasen.
Starte einen Review mit dem review Skill.
Kontext:
git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "kein git repo"git branch --list 2>/dev/null | head -20 || echo "keine"git status --short 2>/dev/null | head -30 || echo "kein git repo"Fuehre den Review gemaess der Skill-Anleitung durch. Lies zuerst den Skill und die Referenzdateien, dann folge den Phasen.
npx claudepluginhub phyr97/phyr97-marketplace --plugin review/reviewReviews staged changes or recent commits across five axes—correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance—producing categorized findings with file:line references and fixes.
/reviewRuns Codex code review on local git state (working tree or vs base branch). Supports --wait/--background, --base <ref>, --scope auto|working-tree|branch.
/reviewInvokes multiple external AI CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, etc.) to independently review a phase plan and produces a structured REVIEWS.md with per-reviewer feedback.
/reviewRuns an enhanced multi-LLM PR review with inline comments, checking availability of local and API-based providers for cross-model escalation.
/reviewReviews HTML file for design anti-patterns, principles violations, and accessibility issues. Generates markdown report with status tables and recommendations.
/reviewReviews specified code scope via four specialists (quality, security, performance, architecture), producing summary, detailed findings, refactoring suggestions, prioritized action plan.