From customer-support
Multi-source research on a customer question or topic with source attribution
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/customer-support:research <question or topic>The summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
# Research > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../CONNECTORS.md). Multi-source research on a customer question, product topic, or account-related inquiry. Synthesizes findings from all available sources with clear attribution. ## Usage ## Workflow ### 1. Parse the Research Request Identify what type of research is needed: - **Customer question**: Something a customer has asked that needs an answer (e.g., "Does our product support SSO with Okta?") - **Issue investigation**: Background on a reported problem (e.g., "Has t...
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Multi-source research on a customer question, product topic, or account-related inquiry. Synthesizes findings from all available sources with clear attribution.
/research <question or topic>
Identify what type of research is needed:
Search in priority order, adapting to what is connected:
Tier 1 — Internal Documentation (highest confidence):
Tier 2 — Team Communications:
Tier 3 — External Sources:
Compile results into a structured research brief:
## Research: [Question/Topic]
### Answer
[Clear, direct answer to the question — lead with the bottom line]
**Confidence:** [High / Medium / Low]
[Explain what drives the confidence level]
### Key Findings
**From [Source 1]:**
- [Finding with specific detail]
- [Finding with specific detail]
**From [Source 2]:**
- [Finding with specific detail]
### Context & Nuance
[Any caveats, edge cases, or additional context that matters]
### Sources
1. [Source name/link] — [what it contributed]
2. [Source name/link] — [what it contributed]
3. [Source name/link] — [what it contributed]
### Gaps & Unknowns
- [What couldn't be confirmed]
- [What might need verification from a subject matter expert]
### Recommended Next Steps
- [Action if the answer needs to go to a customer]
- [Action if further research is needed]
- [Who to consult for verification if needed]
If no connected sources yield results:
If the research is to answer a customer question:
After research is complete, suggest capturing the knowledge:
This helps build institutional knowledge and reduces duplicate research effort across the team.
npx claudepluginhub lohasle/knowledge-work-plugins --plugin customer-support/researchConducts systematic research via four-phase methodology (discovery, investigation, synthesis, reporting) with multi-hop reasoning, web tools, and evidence synthesis. Produces cited reports with confidence levels.
/researchConducts systematic academic and technical research using multiple search engines and AI reasoning, cross-validating sources and synthesizing findings into a structured summary with citations.
/f5-researchConducts deep research on a topic using web search, documentation lookup, code analysis, and AI synthesis, producing structured reports with plans, findings, and evidence.
/SKILLResearches a topic using web search and project context, then saves structured markdown with summary, findings, sources, recommendations, and next steps to research/.
/researchConducts interactive deep research on a topic: captures and refines scope, decomposes into subtopics, performs parallel web searches with source verification, synthesizes into a well-sourced markdown document.
/researchResearches a topic by spawning parallel researchers across codebase, external, market, competitor, and technology types, then trust-annotates and synthesizes findings.