From taches-cc-resources
Analyzes opportunity cost of a choice (or current context) by listing resources consumed, best alternatives, true cost, and verdict on worth.
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/taches-cc-resources:opportunity-cost choice or leave blank for current contextconsider/The summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
<objective> Apply opportunity cost analysis to $ARGUMENTS (or the current discussion if no arguments provided). Every yes is a no to something else. What's the true cost of this choice? </objective> <process> 1. State the choice being considered 2. List what resources it consumes (time, money, energy, attention) 3. Identify the best alternative use of those same resources 4. Compare value of chosen option vs. best alternative 5. Determine if the tradeoff is worth it </process> <output_format> **Choice:** [what you're considering doing] **Resources Required:** - Time: [hours/days/weeks] ...
Every yes is a no to something else. What's the true cost of this choice?
1. State the choice being considered 2. List what resources it consumes (time, money, energy, attention) 3. Identify the best alternative use of those same resources 4. Compare value of chosen option vs. best alternative 5. Determine if the tradeoff is worth it<output_format> Choice: [what you're considering doing]
Resources Required:
Best Alternative Uses:
True Cost: Choosing this means NOT doing [best alternative], which would have provided [value].
Verdict: [Is the chosen option worth more than the best alternative?] </output_format>
<success_criteria>
npx claudepluginhub glittercowboy/taches-cc-resources --plugin taches-cc-resources/thinkApplies structured thinking frameworks like 80/20, First Principles, or SWOT to analyze a problem or decision, producing key insight and recommendation.
/decision-tree-explorerExplores decision branches with probability weighting, expected value analysis, and scenario-based optimization.
/discussDebates implementation approaches by listing 3+ options with pros/cons/effort, comparing criteria, recommending one with reasoning and contingencies.
/trade-off-matrixCompare design options systematically using weighted decision matrix.
/devils-advocateChallenges assumptions, identifies weaknesses, and stress-tests ideas or plans with structured assessments, failure modes, and questions.